As a result, what does a child gain from the support of a financial payer who provides mandated support to a non- biological child and never wants a relationship with the mother or even the child? Where is the parenting and where is the love? We should not mandate alleged fathers to support another man’s child but rather the non-biological father should be given a choice to decide what type of relationship if any he wants with the child without any interference from the court. The bottom line is that it is unreasonable that a man should be responsible for the support and maintenance of another man’s child, because “he did not know or had no reason to know that he was not the biological father.” He should not be responsible even if he did sign an affidavit of paternity in an attempt to do the right thing when he was told he was the alleged father of the child. The rooster has come home to roost and in the age of genetics and DNA paternity testing “the truth shall not be denied.”
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds
BlogoSquare